Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2004

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Toyota Corolla
2004 - 2007
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP97 HP
Torque: 116 NM130 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds12 seconds
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 37 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.7
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway960 km on highway
650 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.18 m
Width: 1.64 m1.71 m
Height: 1.41 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4551`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 200 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6002000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv