Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Ford Escort 1996

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Ford Escort
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 116 NM109 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds14.6 seconds
Ford Escort is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Escort, but torque is 7 NM more than Ford Escort. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.78.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway800 km on highway
650 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.29 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.41 m1.35 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Escort, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`455900
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Ford Escort has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv