Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Alfa Romeo 156 1997

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Alfa Romeo 156
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP155 HP
Torque: 116 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds8.6 seconds
Alfa Romeo 156 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 95 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 156, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Alfa Romeo 156. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.78.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 156.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway950 km on highway
650 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Alfa Romeo 156 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.43 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 29 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 156, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
760 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 75 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 156. The Alfa Romeo 156 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 156.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4551`770
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 6001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 156 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv