Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Toyota Corolla 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 17 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 24 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 452 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 8 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |