Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Toyota Corolla 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |