Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 65 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 197 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |