Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs Peugeot 301 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Peugeot 301, but torque is 3 NM more than Peugeot 301. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 301, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 46 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 301. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`524 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |