Volkswagen Polo 2010 vs BMW 3 series 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 72 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 197 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 15 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.9/10 | 7.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |