Volkswagen Polo 1998 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Felicia. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 6.9 | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Felicia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Golf | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |