Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Opel Corsa 1997

 
Volkswagen Polo
1997 - 2000
Opel Corsa
1997 - 1999
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP106 HP
Torque: 135 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 seconds10.5 seconds
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 31 HP less power than Opel Corsa, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Opel Corsa. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km7.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway750 km on highway
640 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m3.74 m
Width: 1.64 m1.61 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is larger.
Volkswagen Polo is 40 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres1050 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Opel Corsa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 200 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5151`415
Safety:
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Opel Corsa has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv