Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 8 HP less power than Honda Jazz, but torque is 16 NM more than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Jazz gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 30 cm longer than the Honda Jazz, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1323 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 73 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 1.1 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 185 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |