Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Ford Escort 1995

 
Volkswagen Polo
1997 - 2000
Ford Escort
1995 - 1998
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP90 HP
Torque: 116 NM134 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds12.7 seconds
Ford Escort is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Escort, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Ford Escort. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.88.2
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escort.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway830 km on highway
660 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.30 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.43 m1.36 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Escort, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Escort, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4901`200
Safety:
Quality:
above average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Escort has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1000600
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Ford Escort has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv