Volkswagen Polo 1997 vs Fiat Marea 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Fiat Marea is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 43 HP less power than Fiat Marea, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Fiat Marea. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.4 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Marea, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Fiat Marea gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 34 cm shorter than the Fiat Marea, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Marea. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | 1`795 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Marea has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Fiat Marea has
| |