Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 1999

 
Volkswagen Polo
2000 - 2001
Seat Cordoba
1999 - 2003
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 68 HP68 HP
Torque: 133 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.3 seconds17.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.25.1
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle880 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1090 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.16 m
Width: 1.64 m1.64 m
Height: 1.46 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 390 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6201`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Seat Cordoba has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv