Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 306 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 22 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1512 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 262 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`620 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |