Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Cordoba has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |