Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Peugeot 306 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 15 NM more than Peugeot 306. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Polo is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`515 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 306 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |