Volkswagen Polo 2000 vs Volkswagen Golf 1999

 
Volkswagen Polo
2000 - 2001
Volkswagen Golf
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 116 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.3 seconds15.2 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.86.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway1010 km on highway
660 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.40 m
Width: 1.64 m1.74 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 26 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1250 litres1470 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 70 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 220 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4901`735
Safety:
Quality:
above average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv