Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Volkswagen Golf 2012

 
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Volkswagen Golf
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP105 HP
Torque: 230 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds10.7 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.43.8
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
1450 km on highway1510 km on highway
910 km with real consumption940 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.26 m
Width: 1.68 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 28 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1270 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 100 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 318 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6701`800
Safety:
Volkswagen Golf is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 68008200
Rating in user reviews: 6.4/10 8.7/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv