Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Nissan Micra 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Nissan Micra have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Micra. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.4 | 3.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.9 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Nissan Micra 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1004 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |