Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Ford Fiesta 2012

 
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Ford Fiesta
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP80 HP
Torque: 175 NMn/a NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds14.9 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.94.3
Real fuel consumption: 5.9 l/100km6.7 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 90 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1100 km on highway
760 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m3.95 m
Width: 1.68 m1.72 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`495
Safety:
Ford Fiesta is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
above average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Fiesta has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 68004800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Ford Fiesta has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv