Volkswagen Polo 2014 vs Nissan Micra 2017

 
Volkswagen Polo
2014 - 2017
Nissan Micra
2017 -
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol0.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP90 HP
Torque: 95 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.84.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.2 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres41 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1100 km on highway
730 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.97 m4.00 m
Width: 1.68 m1.74 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 280 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1004 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 52 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5701`530
Safety:
Volkswagen Polo scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Polo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 560010 400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Nissan Micra has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv