Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Opel Astra 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Opel Astra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 64 HP82 HP
Torque: 124 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds14.5 seconds
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 18 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.65.8
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1080 km on highway
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 700'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Polo engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Seat Toledo, Skoda FeliciaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.11 m
Width: 1.66 m1.71 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 39 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1180 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 125 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 205 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`745
Safety:
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv