Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Opel Astra 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
1996 - 1999
Opel Astra
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 135 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds16.5 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo and Opel Astra have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 7 NM more than Opel Astra. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.68.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
660 km on highway820 km on highway
520 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 5 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat CordobaUsed also on Opel Vectra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.11 m
Width: 1.66 m1.71 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 39 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1180 litres
Opel Astra has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 125 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 205 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`625
Safety:
Quality:
high

average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv