Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2001 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo 1995 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo 2001, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Polo 2001. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo 1995 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo 1995 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo 1995 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo 2001. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo 2001 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2001 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo 1995 is 18 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo 2001, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo 1995 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo 1995 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo 2001, which means Volkswagen Polo 1995 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volkswagen Polo 2001 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo 1995 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo 2001, so Volkswagen Polo 2001 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |