Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Volkswagen Golf 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 107 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 9 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
650 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.02 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 6.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |