Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Volkswagen Golf 1992

 
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Volkswagen Golf
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP60 HP
Torque: 116 NM107 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds16.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 9 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
650 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.02 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 30 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 245 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`400no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv