Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Seat Toledo 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 71 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 11 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.4 | |
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is 60 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |