Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Peugeot 206 2000

 
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Peugeot 206
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP110 HP
Torque: 116 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds9.4 seconds
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 50 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.56.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway980 km on highway
650 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.82 m
Width: 1.66 m1.65 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres245 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1130 litres
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`553
Safety:
Quality:
high

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 206 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv