Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Mazda 121 1996

 
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
Mazda 121
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 116 NM110 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds12.7 seconds
Mazda 121 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 121, but torque is 6 NM more than Mazda 121. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 121.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway710 km on highway
650 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.83 m
Width: 1.66 m1.63 m
Height: 1.42 m1.32 m
Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 121, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litresno data
Volkswagen Polo has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 121.
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 121.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`435
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

low
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 121 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Mazda 121 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv