Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Skoda Felicia 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Skoda Felicia. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Vento | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 14 cm shorter than the Skoda Felicia, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |