Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 116 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo and Seat Ibiza have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
Volkswagen Polo is 13 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |