Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 111 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 106 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 106, but torque is 5 NM more than Peugeot 106. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`315 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |