Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Fiat Croma 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 102 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 97 NM less than Fiat Croma. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 80 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |