Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs BMW 3 series 1993

 
Volkswagen Polo
1995 - 1999
BMW 3 series
1993 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 60 HP102 HP
Torque: 116 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 seconds12 seconds
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 42 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 34 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle670 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway880 km on highway
650 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Polo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 4 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen VentoUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.21 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.42 m1.39 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Polo is 49 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres325 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1030 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 80 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 55 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`635
Safety:
Quality:
high

below average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10001800
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv