Volkswagen Polo 1994 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 55 HP | |
| Torque: | 100 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 18 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Fox have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 6 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`375 kg | 1`480 kg | |
| Net weight: | 955 kg | 998 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 420 kg | 482 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volkswagen Fox. Therefore, Volkswagen Fox is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |