Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 74 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Peugeot 106 have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 12 NM more than Peugeot 106. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |