Volkswagen Polo 1996 vs Honda Jazz 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 78 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Honda Jazz is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Honda Jazz. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1323 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 135 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 348 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`455 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 480 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |