Volkswagen Polo 1995 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 45 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 76 NM | 74 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21.4 seconds | 19.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 106 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 5 HP less power than Peugeot 106, but torque is 2 NM more than Peugeot 106. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 106 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is larger. Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 953 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 30 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 106 has
| |