Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Golf
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP68 HP
Torque: 124 NM133 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.6 seconds17.2 seconds
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.1
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1300 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m4.15 m
Width: 1.63 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 41 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1184 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 209 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4351`720
Safety:
Quality:
above average

high
Volkswagen Golf has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Golf quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv