Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Passat 2005

 
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2000
Volkswagen Passat
2005 - 2010
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP105 HP
Torque: 124 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.6 seconds12 seconds
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 41 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 126 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.6
Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1480 km on highway
Volkswagen Passat gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m4.76 m
Width: 1.63 m1.82 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 102 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres565 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litresno data
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 320 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4352`030
Safety:
Quality:Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 305 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv