Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Lupo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 34 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 130 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
975 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 145 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`500 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`010 kg | 980 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 340 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Volkswagen Lupo. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Lupo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |