Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 126 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |