Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Golf 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2001
Volkswagen Golf
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 116 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds14 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.56.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway1030 km on highway
540 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m4.15 m
Width: 1.63 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 41 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres330 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1185 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 210 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`640
Safety:
Quality:
above average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably better
Average price (€): 10001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv