Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Volkswagen Lupo 1998

 
Volkswagen Polo
1999 - 2001
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 50 HP50 HP
Torque: 86 NM86 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.4 seconds17.7 seconds
Volkswagen Polo and Volkswagen Lupo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.75.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.4 l/100km6.4 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Lupo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres34 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle600 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway730 km on highway
700 km with real consumption530 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 3 years3 years

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m3.53 m
Width: 1.63 m1.64 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
Volkswagen Polo is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Lupo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres130 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres830 litres
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Polo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Lupo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 145 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Lupo, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3751`340
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Lupo has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 10001000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volkswagen Lupo has
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv