Volkswagen Polo 1999 vs Skoda Fabia 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 NM | 84 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.4 seconds | 20.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo and Skoda Fabia have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Polo torque is 2 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 22 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 1015 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |