Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |