Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Fox is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 6 HP less power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Fox. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
| By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.54 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1030 litres | 1016 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Volkswagen Polo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`630 kg | 1`570 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`083 kg | 1`085 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 547 kg | 485 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Volkswagen Fox. Therefore, Volkswagen Polo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |