Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Ford Fiesta. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
860 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 245 litres | 284 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
975 litres | 945 litres | |
Volkswagen Polo has 39 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 30 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`550 | 1`560 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Ford Fiesta has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford Fiesta, so Ford Fiesta quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |