Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Mazda 2 2003

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP68 HP
Torque: 195 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds16 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 7 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.5
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1120 km on highway
860 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.54 m
Volkswagen Polo is smaller.
Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1044 litres
Mazda 2 has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Polo has 22 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 69 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`535
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Polo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv