Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Citroen C3 2002

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Citroen C3
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP68 HP
Torque: 195 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds15.4 seconds
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Polo engine produces 7 HP more power than Citroen C3, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Citroen C3. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.2
Real fuel consumption: 5.2 l/100km4.7 l/100km
The Citroen C3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1070 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway1180 km on highway
860 km with real consumption950 km with real consumption
Citroen C3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.85 m
Width: 1.65 m1.67 m
Height: 1.46 m1.52 m
Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 245 litres305 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
975 litres1150 litres
Citroen C3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C3. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 (by 175 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C3.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5501`501
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Citroen C3 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Polo, so Citroen C3 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Polo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • hydraulic power steering
Citroen C3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv